INTRODUCTION
Forensic document experts works on the detection of document forgery. Experts analyze the document by dividing it into three parts. These are paper, writing instruments and ink. Ink age is determined according to changes in the ink structure over time by analytical methods[1]. There are many studies from past to present regarding ink age determination. Most of these studies based on at detecting either the degradation of colorants or the evaporation of their solvents by chromatographic or spectroscopic methods [2-13]. The reason for using ratio in studies on age determination is to eliminate changes in the amount of ink caused by ink print. In this study, the age of suspicious writings was determined by analyzing both the colorants with high pressure liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UV) and the phenoxyethanol with thermal desorption –gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (TD-GC/MS). In this study, both dye ratio(Crystal Violet peak area/Methyl Violet peak area) and the relative solvent ratio (V %) were used.

CASE
Creditor A.D. and Debtor H.U. issue a promissory note in 10/10/2014. The promissory note also bears the signature of the debtor. According to Debtor H.U, Creditor A.D. changed the amount section on the signed promissory note and increased the amount that Debtor H.U. should pay. In 2017, when it came to us, the court requested a report on whether the ink structures of the writing, numbers and signatures on the deed are the same, whether there is an age difference between them, and whether they are issued on a new date and shown as old. Samples taken from name and signature shown in Figure 1.

MATERIAL AND METHOD
Analytical Methods
To perform the HPLC analysis for crystal violet (CV), methyl violet (MV), tetramethyl pararosanil (TPR), and Victoria blue (VB), the Thermo Scientific Degasser System SCM 1000, Pump Spectra System P1000, Autosampler Spectra System AS3000, and UV detector 1000 system were utilized. The Phenomenex Onyx C18 Monolithic Column (100×4.6 mm) was used. For the analysis of phenoxyethanol, the Unity Thermal Desorber Agilent HP 6890N GC 5975B MS (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) was used. The column used was a DBVR-X (60m×0.25 mm; thickness 1.4 µm), and a Tenax tube with activated carbon removal was used. Method validation and experimental steps are described elsewhere [3].

Sample Preparation
To prepare samples for analyzing dye content, two samples were taken from the suspicious writings using a 1.2 mm punch. These samples were mixed with 200 µL of methanol and vigorously mixed for 5 minutes using a vortex. The resulting mixture was then subjected to analysis using HPLC.
To analyze phenoxyethanol content, samples were taken from the signature, text, and non-ink parts of the paper using a 5 mm punch. This was done because solvents tend to diffuse both horizontally and vertically from the moment ink is transferred to paper. Placing a newly written paper on top of a promissory note can cause solvent migration and contamination. The samples were then analyzed using TD-GC/MS.

RESULTS and DISCUSSION
HPLC and TD-GC/MS are commonly used together for ink ageing analysis because they are complementary analytical techniques that allow for the detection and quantification of a wide range of ink components. HPLC is used for the separation and identification of dyes and pigments in ink samples, while TD-GC/MS is used for the identification and quantification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the same sample. By using both techniques together, it is possible to analyze both non-volatile and volatile components in the ink sample, providing a more complete picture of its composition. TD-GC-MS is used for documents requiring short-term age determination, while HPLC is used for documents requiring long-term age determination. Phenoxyethanol analysis by TD-GC-MS is used to determine the time of suspicious writings for 0-24 months old documents. If phenoxyethanol analysis cannot be used to determine the time of suspicious writings, i.e. if the allegation in the document is older than 24 months and it is thought that there is a difference of at least 4 years between the creation times of suspicious writings, dyestuff analysis by HPLC is used.
Analysis of Dyes
Crystal violet and methyl violet dyestuffs were detected in the inks taken from both signature and writing samples. Chromatograms were given in Figure 2 and 3. Results were given in Table 1.

When the CV peak area/MV peak area ratios of two suspicious texts on the same document are compared, three situations will emerge.
These :
Ratio A ˂ Ratio B: A is written before B
Ratio A = Ratio B: Both articles were written at the same time
Ratio A˃ Ratio B: A is written after B
When the obtained rates were evaluated, it was determined that there was no significant difference and no interpretation could be made. In order for there to be a significant difference between the rates, there must be at least 4 years between the writing time of the suspicious articles.
Analysis of Phenoxyethanol
The relative phenoxyethanol ratios (V%) of the analyzed samples were calculated. Results were given in Table 2.
In order to determine whether there is phenoxyethanol contamination in the document from another document, a sample was taken from the non-ink part of the suspect document and analyzed in TD-GC/MS as mentioned in the analytical methods section. We used V%-time(month) curve for V% values obtained from suspicious articles. V%-time curve was used from our previous study as the age curve. When we compare the V% values we obtained from suspicious articles with the curve, the signature was made within 3-7 months from the date of analysis but 2.000.000£ was not evaluated because the V% value was below 10. Since the curve starts to flatten below 10 in the V%-time(month) curve, there is no comment for this value and below.

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the analysis of the suspicious promissory note aimed to determine whether the writing on it was done in 2014 or on a later date. Two analytical methods, dye analysis and phenoxyethanol analysis, were utilized to provide evidence for the court. Samples were taken from the ink and non-ink parts of the document and analyzed using HPLC and TD-GC/MS, respectively.The phenoxyethanol analysis also provided evidence of contamination from another document. The V%-time curve was used to determine the age of the document, and it was found that the signature was made within 3-7 months from the date of analysis. Therefore, the document could not have been issued in 2014 as alleged.
Consequently, the use of analytical methods in forensic science plays a critical role in providing evidence in legal cases. The combination of different techniques allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the samples and provides strong evidence that can be used in court. In this particular case, the use of HPLC and TD-GC/MS allowed for the determination of the age of the document and provided evidence that the document was not written in 2014 but at a later date. This study demonstrates the importance of analytical methods in forensic science and their potential to contribute to the resolution of legal cases.

1. Ezcurra M, Góngora JMG, Maguregui I, Alonso R. Analytical methods for dating modern writing instrument inks on paper. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197:1-20.
2. Bugler J, Buchner H. Age determination of ballpoint ink by thermal desorption and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:982-8.
3. Islek D, İsat E, Cengiz S. Determination of changes in crystal violet and phenoxyethanol(Ink Dating). J Forensic Sci. 2019;65:661-3.
4. Weyermann C, Kirsch D, Vera CC, Spengler B. A GC/MS study of the drying of ballpoint pen ink on a paper. J Forensic Sci. 2007;168:119-27.
5. Brazeau L, Gaudreau M. Ballpoint pen inks:the quantitative analysis of ink solvents on paper by solid phase microextraction. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:209-15.
6. Andrasko J. HPLC analysis of ballpoint pen inks stored at different conditions. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46:21-30.
7. Samandiou VF, Nikolaidou KI, Papadoyannis IN. Development and validation of a gradient‐hplc‐pdad method for the identification of ballpoint pen ink components:study of their decomposition on aging for forensic science applications. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2007;27:215-35.
8. Weyermann C, Kirsch D, Vera CC, Spengler B. Photofading of ballpoint dyes studied on paper by LDI and MALDI MS. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2006;17:297-306.
9. Sharma V, Kumar R. Dating of ballpoint pen writing inks via spectroscopic and multiple linear regression analysis: a novel approach microchem. Journal. 2017;134:104-13.
10. Ng LK, Brazeau L, Lafontaine P. Ballpoint Pen inks: characterization by positive and negative ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for the forensic examination of writing inks. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47:200-10.
11. Li B, Xie P, Guo Y, Fei Q. GC analysis of black gel pen ink stored under different conditions J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:543-9.
12. Saini K, Rathore R. Differentiation of gel pen inks by using high performance thin layer chromatography and gas chromatography- mass spectrometry. Malaysian J Forensic Sci. 2018;8:10-7.
13. Islek DS,Cengiz S. Ink dating on documents aging due to enviromental factors using TD-GC/MS and HPLC-UV. 2020;29;8689-96.